1Fogle
Thursday, November 7, 2013
Shape Constancy
Shape Constancy is when we perceive a form of a familiar object as having a constant shape, even when the image of it truly does change. An example would be an outlet. When looking at it from above, we see that it portrays a shape of a square more than anything. However, because we know the familiar object, we still perceive it as being rectangular.
Brightness Constancy
Brightness Constancy is how we perceive an object as having a constant lightness even when its illumination varies. We also perceive an object as having relative luminance, which means that the amount of light an object reflects is related to its surroundings. An example of this could be the two candles. One is directly in the light while the other is not, changing the colors of them. However, we still perceive them as being the exact same color.
Size Constancy
Size constancy is where we perceive objects as a constant size, even while our distance from them varies. Even though there may be a wide distance between you and the object being perceived, we still see that object of having the same constant size. An example of this is having two lotion bottles far apart. They have the same dimensions even though there is still much distance between them. We still have the ability to perceive that the furthest away bottle is the same size as the nearest.
Motion Perception
Motion perception illustrates the concept that our brain
constructs our perceptions. Motion, for instance, is a mere perception of a
series of still-images that are interpreted to show change in position. Animation
uses such a technique in which still-images are flashed in quick, successive
order to give the illusion of motion, here called stroboscopic movement. This
idea is illustrated by the images below depicting a series of still-images in which
a ball changes position. Should the images be shown in a rapid, successive
order, the brain would perceive the changes in the ball’s position to be
motion.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Monocular Cue- Interposition
Interposition is a monocular cue that helps us to determine
the relative depth of objects by considering which is closer. Specifically, if
one object partially blocks the view of another, the object in front is
perceived to be closer than the object it obscures. In the example below, the
zebra figurine partially blocks the view of the cow behind it. As a result, our
retinas correctly perceive the zebra to be closer to the eye than the cow.
Monocular Cue- Relative Size
Monocular Cues aid in the depth perception of each eye separately
when the disparity of an image is too slight to accurately determine depth. Relative
size is one such indication of depth that assumes a smaller retinal image shows
an object that is located farther away than those that appear larger. In the
example below, is the passport booklet larger than a standard globe? If they
were at the same distance, then the answer would be no; however, in this case,
our retinas correctly assume that because the retinal image of the globe is
smaller than that of the passport booklet, then the globe is farther away.
Binocular Cue- Retinal Disparity
Binocular Cues are crucial tools in determining the extent
of a human’s depth perception, that is, the ability to see both near and far. Because
our eyes are separated by several inches, each of our retinas pick up different
images, and the differences between them are called the retinal disparity.
Because it is more difficult for the eyes to perceive a single image of objects
closer to the retina, the closer the object, the greater the disparity. The
pictures below illustrate the concept of retinal disparity; imagine that the top picture is the image received by the left eye and the bottom image is received
by the right, and the same placement of the finger and camera are used in both
images. Because the finger is very near to the retinas, it has a very high disparity,
meaning that the image of the finger differs between the two pictures. However,
because the globe is farther away, it has a lower disparity, and as a result
the two images of the globe are relatively similar in placement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)